I have a question.

[Futurehabitatcreator]

Okay thanks.


A question a little off topic.


Right now I got one GTF in a 40 gallon tank, I'm planning just to add one more GTF, and one anole.

Will that work out?

I'm not to sure about it because anoles are probaly much faster than GTF's at eating and they may eat most of the crickets.

[froggsong]

I think I told you before that you could house up to 4 GTFs and 2 Anoles in that tank. I'm sorry, but it is getting very frustrating that you keep asking the same questions over and over again, even though you've already gotten an answer.

As for the question about feeding, that is a good question. Anoles are active during the day, and the frogs are active at night, so to avoid the anole eating all the crickets, you should probably be feeding the anole during the day, and the frogs at night. Or, you could just make sure you put in enough crickets to feed everyone. The should eat as many crickets as they want anyway, and then they will stop eating, leaving the rest for your frogs. And yes, anoles are faster at running, but the GTFs don't walk to a meal, they pounce on it. So you can't really compare it by saying one is faster than the other.On the contrary, my frogs used to eat before my anole, because they would pounce on a cricket as soon as they saw it out of the corner of their eye.

[Futurehabitatcreator]

okay thanks


I'll try and not repeat questions =p.

[Futurehabitatcreator]

Wow Frogsong, Gave me bad reputation? Just because I've asked the question before doesn't mean its always towards you. That question was open for everyone, just because you've answered it before doesn't mean someone else can't give me a different opinion.

[froggsong]

Who said I gave you a bad rep? I can assure you I did not.

If people didn't answer the question before, why do you think they are going to answer it now? I was not the only one who answered that question before, what was wrong with their advice? It seems to me like you are going to ask the same question until you get the answer you want to hear. If you are going to do what you want to anyway, what is the point in asking the question over and over again?

[Tiamat]

I have to agree with froggsong on this one. For someone who follows the forum activities, it is evident that you have been asking the same questions again and again. Advises have already been given to you.

Now is time for you to deal with the info and start going.

If your questions are answered, i doubt asking another time will bring any different answers. Do you actually follow your posts to see what people said? Or you are just aiming for serial questioning and do like you want in the end anyway?

I am just teasing.

Anyway, you should read back you topics over the last 2 weeks. I am pretty sure you can gatter all the info you need. If you don't like it, just don't follow it. That's all.

[Futurehabitatcreator]

Haven't you noticed? I've gone through most of my threads and edited the 1st post cuz I'm done with the thread.


If Froggsong didn't, then I don't know who did.

About 2 minutes after Froggsong said I repeat questions, I got the comment. Coincidence?


_-

Yes I do follow my threads.

[froggsong]

You really shouldn't go back and edit the first post in your thread, whether you are done with it or not, because the post is still around, and people in the future who may have the same question won't be able to follow the thread, because they won't know what question was asked.

And yes, it could just be a coincidence, especially since I am obviously not the only one who is annoyed by it. Regardless, the rep system is so that people can see how much stock to put in your advice, and is completely anonymous. However, yes I did give you the bad rep. I generally don't lie, but I felt from your comment that you would retaliate. I see that you did anyway, and didn't even bother to leave a comment about why. Of course, that could be a coincidence too, but like you, I am sure it is not. However, unlike you, my rep can take a hit just fine, so I'm not worried about it. It IS however, against to rules to retaliate for someone giving you bad rep, as far as I know. So, who was in the wrong there?

[froggsong]

Here is a little snippet from one of the post on the Rep System sticky:

"The reputation system is not to be used for baseless or personal reasons. It should not be used "just because" or "tit-for-tat". This includes but is not limited to "fluffing" or "twinking" someone by awarding them points because they are your online buddy, because you both disagree with the same poster or anything equally shallow. On the flip side negative points should not be left merely because you disagree with someone, have any sort of personal rivalries or for any other vindictive reasons. Misuse of this system may result in being "neutered" either temporarily or permanently depending on the severity of the situation. If this occcurs you may be placed in a different usergroup that lacks the ability to use the reputation system at all regardless of your current status. "

Here is a link, maybe you should check out the thread: reputation system

[Tiamat]

You should be able to organised your topics in the way that you do not need to edit anything. It is not to froggsong to re-read what he has already read just to make sure you didn't edit your original message.

Edition is usually used in a forum in 2 ways:
-to correct a msg either just posted, or where several members note that you did a mistake and it needs to be corrected.
-Or you are meaking a 'sticky topic' or a 'followup' topic where you specify you will update information.

Do not expect people to follow your thought with your posting if you edit msg like you said you did. All that to say that froggsong has done nothing wrong. And you, you need to gatter your thoughts a little better when posting.

Now just calm down, everything is good and cool. There is no evil creature trying to drag you into a 'soap opera' setup.

edit: lol froggsong answered a moment before me :P damned you write fast!!!