
07-13-2009, 08:55 PM
|
|
Catching the Bug
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 80
|
|
Dubia roaches - are they really better?
I wanted my title to catch some attention from those who have had experience using Blaptica dubia as a feeder insect. I have been keeping B. dubia for about 3 months now. I still haven't had any reproductions yet, my males and females are still too immature. But I have been buying what nymphs I need to feed my Hispaniolian White-lipped Anole (Anolis coelestinus). She loves them.
But I am wondering if dubia roaches really do have a higher 'meat to shell ratio' than crickets. Does this claim apply to all stages of the roaches life, incl. nymphs, or only the adults, or near-adults? From what I can see of my nymphs, they don't seem to me to be very "meaty". In fact they look so flat in comparison with crickets of similar size, that I wonder if the claim has a real basis in fact.
The size of dubia nymphs that I use for feeding are in the small size category, say 1/2 inch or a little more. My anole can handle those up to about 3/4 inch ok but nothing larger than that.
So, is the higher 'meat to shell ratio' of dubia roaches really true? For all stages of the roach's life, incl. nymphs?
|